The price list takes four lines to write down. The hard part is not the money — it is that a business selling to visitors and to the trade at once needs two keyword lists, the automation will propose the wrong one first, and somebody in your building has to sit down and say no.
The numbers first. A domain on AutoSEO costs $149 monthly; the same domain on FullSEO costs $500. A Wikipedia slot is priced at $10, and you take 0, 1, 5 or 10 of them. A PBN slot is priced at $1, in counts of 0, 20, 100 or 500. What follows is arithmetic and staffing.
Two audiences turn into two keyword pools
A staging company rents to a touring production and to a corporate awards night. A dental group treats families who have lived in Wilson County for thirty years and families who arrived last month for a job at the plant. A venue books a label showcase and a wedding. In every case there are two demand curves under one roof, described in two vocabularies that share almost no words.
An automated campaign discovers keywords and puts them in order. The ordering is driven by volume, and in this market volume belongs almost entirely to the visitor half. So the queue that arrives for approval is dominated by phrasing your professional customers would never type, and if nobody intervenes, that is the campaign you have bought.
The high-volume pool
Plain-English phrasing from people describing an occasion. Plentiful, cheap to find, and the automation will surface it first every time.
- Big numbers, wide intent
- Often seasonal and easily won
- Rarely the profitable half of the book
The low-volume pool
Trade nouns, specifications, formats, classifications. Thin volume, ruinous to lose, and invisible in any list sorted by search count.
- Dozens of searches, not thousands
- Each one attached to a real quote
- Only a practitioner recognizes them
That is why the honest way to compare $149 against $500 is not to read two feature lists. It is to ask which tier gives you the controls you will actually use, given who is available in your company on a Tuesday afternoon to make judgment calls about words.
The four lines, and what they come to over a year
Monthly prices flatter themselves. The annual figure is the one an owner can hold up beside every other claim on the same budget, so both appear below.
| Line | Unit | Steps available | Per month | Twelve months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AutoSEO | Per domain | — | $149 | $1,788 |
| FullSEO | Per domain | — | $500 | $6,000 |
| Wikipedia placements | $10 per slot | 0 / 1 / 5 / 10 | $0 – $100 | $0 – $1,200 |
| PBN placements | $1 per slot | 0 / 20 / 100 / 500 | $0 – $500 | $0 – $6,000 |
Now put those against something a reader in these industries prices without thinking. A day in a good tracking room. One booked event with staff, rentals and a bar. A week of front-of-house cover at a mid-sized venue. The entry tier is roughly the cheapest of those; the upper tier is roughly one of the middling ones, repeated monthly.
Four thousand two hundred and twelve dollars is the whole decision. It is not a large number for a company that turns over a booked weekend in the same amount, and it is a serious number for a three-person trade business. What matters is whether it buys anything you will use.
AutoSEO at $149 — everything runs, nothing waits for you
AutoSEO — SEO that does not need a meeting
For a company where no one has a weekly slot free to adjudicate vocabulary.
- Terms discovered and ordered by the software. Candidates surface week after week and arrive ranked, with nobody compiling a spreadsheet after hours.
- Links accumulate unattended. The partner network behind the placements runs past 230,000 websites, worked at a pace no part-time marketing role keeps up with.
- Page-level recommendations. What a given URL of yours is missing, rather than advice addressed to websites in general.
- Nothing on the measurement side is withheld. The Search Console screens, rank tracking, the keyword-dynamics view and a chat assistant wired into this project's figures.
The candidate queue is present at this tier too, and every term still receives its individual verdict. What the entry price does not include is the right to hand the campaign a list and insist on it. You steer by editing proposals, never by making them.
For a business with one audience, that is often enough and occasionally better, since the software has no favorites and no memory of an argument from 2019. For a business with two audiences, it means the volume pool sets the agenda unless somebody works the queue every week.
FullSEO at $500 — and the mode change underneath it
FullSEO — automation with the manual controls exposed
For a business where somebody who knows the trade can spend a quarter-hour a week deciding.
- You pick the terms; the software picks when you do not. Choosing by hand is the point of this tier, and an automatic fallback sits beneath it so a silent week does not halt the campaign.
- Placement by hand, against a DR figure you set. Links directed at a Domain Authority floor rather than taken in whatever sequence they happen to appear.
- A review step in front of every on-site edit. No change goes live until a person signs it off, which is what you want on any page carrying prices, capacities or regulated wording.
- Staff attached to the account. Specialists, developers and writers on the Semalt side, on top of everything the entry tier was already doing.
The automatic fallback deserves a paragraph of its own, because it is the mechanism that makes the upper tier either excellent value or a slow waste. It means the campaign never stalls waiting for a human. It also means nobody will ever chase you for a decision.
So a company that pays $500 and never opens the keyword queue receives, in practice, the automated behavior it could have had for $149, plus a review step nobody performs. The upper tier is priced for participation. Buy it when you have a participant.
Wikipedia and PBN slots, and what volume does not buy
Wikipedia placements
Small counts, priced per slot, taken in steps rather than by the unit.
PBN placements
Cheap per unit and sold in large steps, which is exactly where the judgment is required.
The same logic applies to the DR target available at the upper tier. Aiming placements at a Domain Authority floor is a way of spending the same budget on fewer, better positions, and it is the reason directing links at a Domain Authority threshold matters more to a trade-facing business than any raw count.
Three sources feed the pool. One person empties it.
The candidate pool has three feeds. Search Console contributes the queries you were already shown for. Live results-page readings contribute what the market is fighting over. Your own seed terms contribute what you know and neither of the others could guess. Each candidate then gets one of three verdicts — approved, rejected, or held back — decided singly.
That last sentence is the whole product for a two-audience business. It is also the sentence most companies read past, because it describes work rather than a feature — and unowned work does not happen.
- The queue arrives biased, by design. Ordering by volume is correct behavior for software with no opinion about margins. It is the wrong order for a business whose profitable half is the quiet half.
- Rejection is the high-value action. Most of the value at this step comes from removing terms, not adding them. A pool cleaned of phrasing you would refuse to quote on is worth more than a pool twice its size.
- Defer is the state that keeps the peace. Seasonal visitor phrasing is not wrong, it is early. Deferring it settles the argument between the person watching volume and the person watching margin without either of them losing.
- Two campaigns beat one blended list. Keep the vocabularies apart at the campaign level, because a merged list produces pages that match neither and reporting that explains nothing.
Now the part that gets skipped: naming the person. A marketing coordinator can run the queue mechanically, but cannot know that two fixture names are not interchangeable, that one trade classification means a different insurance requirement, or that a phrase in the list describes work your shop stopped taking two years ago. Those are practitioner judgments.
| Decision in the queue | Who can actually make it | Why not somebody else |
|---|---|---|
| Is this a term we quote on? | The person who writes quotes | Only they know what gets refused |
| Are these two terms the same thing? | A practitioner in the trade | The distinction is invisible from outside |
| Is this worth winning at our margin? | Owner or operations lead | Volume says nothing about profit |
| Can we service more of this? | Whoever owns the schedule | Winning unservable work costs reviews |
| Does this belong to the other pool? | Anyone, once the split is written down | It is a filing decision, not a judgment |
The practical arrangement that works: one practitioner, fifteen minutes a week, with a written rule for the difficult case. That is a little over an hour a month of somebody billable, spent on the one decision the software cannot make, and it is the cheapest part of the whole line.
A worked example, start to finish
Take a staging and lighting rental company in Middle Tennessee. One domain. Half the revenue from tours and production companies, half from corporate events and weddings. The head estimator agrees to review the keyword queue on Friday mornings.
The plan is deliberately unheroic. Three months on the entry tier to build a record and see what the pool proposes. Then a switch to the upper tier once it is obvious that the trade vocabulary needs choosing rather than discovering. Add-ons taken at their smallest useful steps, late enough to be aimed at something.
| Period | What is running | Monthly | Months | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Months 1–3 | AutoSEO, one domain | $149 | 3 | $447 |
| Months 4–12 | FullSEO, one domain | $500 | 9 | $4,500 |
| Months 4–12 | PBN, first step (20 slots) | $20 | 9 | $180 |
| Months 5–12 | Wikipedia, one slot | $10 | 8 | $80 |
| Total | Twelve months, one domain | — | 12 | $5,207 |
Check the arithmetic yourself: three months at $149 is $447; nine at $500 is $4,500; nine at $20 is $180; eight at $10 is $80. Those four add to $5,207, an average of $433.92 a month. A straight twelve months of the upper tier with no add-ons would be $6,000, so the staged approach costs $793 less and spends three of those months learning what to buy.
Time, and which tier fits which business
Expect the first thing you can measure somewhere between the fourth and the eighth week. It shows up in the data rather than the bank: impressions broadening, a few terms crossing into the top thirty. Because Search Console reports roughly two days in arrears, the tail of any window you open is still unsettled.
A realistic shape for a twelve-month run: the first quarter produces a record and a cleaned keyword pool, the second produces position movement on the terms you chose, and the second half is where the trade vocabulary starts converting, because low-volume terms take longer to accumulate the evidence that moves them. Anybody promising commercial results inside a quarter is describing a different business than yours.
AutoSEO at $149 suits you if
One domain, one dominant audience, and nobody who can reliably give the queue a quarter-hour a week.
- Vocabulary is plain rather than technical
- No compliance-sensitive page copy
- You would rather buy motion than control
FullSEO at $500 suits you if
Two audiences, a practitioner willing to review, and pages carrying prices, capacities or regulated language.
- Trade terms must be chosen, not inferred
- Placement quality is judged by your buyers
- Nothing should go live unreviewed
One panel carries both tiers, so the analytics, the rank tracking, the indexing tools and the generative research are identical either way. Only the controls differ. The two campaign tiers set out together is the quickest way to see which switches genuinely change, and an assistant that swallows keyword lists in batches is how your estimator's seed list reaches the pool without anyone retyping it.
We work through these decisions with businesses across Middle Tennessee, and we write up what we learn on our blog; the campaign side of it is covered under our services. Price both tiers against your own domain — then go and ask the person who writes your quotes whether they will spend a Friday morning on it, because that answer decides which line you buy.
Questions people ask before signing anything
Is it sensible to begin at $149 and upgrade afterwards?
Usually, yes — for a two-audience business it is the natural order. Those opening months on the lower tier assemble the record that the manual controls above need, so by the time you move up you know which terms to insist on rather than guessing at them.
Are the prices per domain or per company?
Per domain. Two domains on the entry tier are $298 a month, not $149. If you run a separate site for one part of the business — a venue and its restaurant, say — budget each one separately and decide whether both need the upper tier or only the one with the technical vocabulary.
Suppose the keyword queue never gets reviewed at all?
The campaign keeps running, because the fallback is automatic. What you get is the volume pool, since that is what ranks highest without an opinion applied. Traffic rises, the trade side stays flat, and the report looks better than the business feels. That gap is the single most common failure here.
A dollar a slot sounds trivial — why not take the biggest step?
No. The unit price is the least useful thing about that line. Five hundred slots is the same annual cost as the upper campaign tier, and a large count of weak placements does not equal a small number of respected ones. Start at the smallest step, aim it at something specific, and increase only if you can say what improved.
How long before I should expect this to pay for itself?
Nobody can tell you that honestly, because it depends on your margin per job and how much work you can absorb. What can be said is that first measurable movement usually appears at four to eight weeks, and low-volume trade terms move later than high-volume ones. Judge the first quarter on whether the keyword pool is right, not on revenue.